:: LEX :: PERSONAL AUTONOMY IN LEGAL DOCTRINES OF AYN RAND AND KARL MARX
UA  RU  EN
 
  Main page
  How to take part in a scientific conference?
  Calendar of conferences
  Editorial board. PA «Naukova Spilnota»
  Äîãîâ³ð ïðî ñï³âðîá³òíèöòâî ç Wyzsza Szkola Zarzadzania i Administracji w Opolu
  Archive

Actual researches of legal and historical science (Issue 61)

Date of conference

16 May 2024

Remaining time to start conference 0


  Scientific conferences
 

  Useful legal internet resources
 

 Useful references
 
Íîâ³ âèìîãè äî ïóáë³êàö³é ðåçóëüòàò³â êàíäèäàòñüêèõ òà äîêòîðñüêèõ äèñåðòàö³é
Þðèäè÷íèé ôîðóì
Çàêîíîäàâñòâî Óêðà¿íè
ªäèíèé äåðæàâíèé ðåºñòð ñóäîâèõ ð³øåíü


 Counters


 References


 Our bottun
www.lex-line.com.ua - ̳æíàðîäí³ íàóêîâî-ïðàêòè÷í³ ³íòåðíåò-êîíôåðåíö³¿ çà ð³çíèìè þðèäè÷íèìè íàïðÿìêàìè

PERSONAL AUTONOMY IN LEGAL DOCTRINES OF AYN RAND AND KARL MARX
 
17.06.2017 06:28
Author: Yurii Sheliazhenko, LL.M., postgraduate at KROK University of Economics and Law
[Section 1. Theory and history of the state and law. History of political and legal studies. Philosophy of law]

In the world of social inequality where grows gap in the wealth of rich and poor people, law and justice morally obliged to overcome poverty by resolving conflicts of economic interests concerning fair distribution of goods. Every conflict reveals extreme approaches, needed to be reconciled on the ground of rule of law. In the political economy such extremes are socialism and capitalism. Judging capitalist and socialist policies, according to principle “audi alteram partem” I propose to compare and analyze legal foundations of both policies represented by socialism’s advocate Karl Marx and capitalism’s advocate Ayn Rand. Proponents of reason, practical knowledge and limitation of government, both influential philosophers propose different view on personal autonomy as the scope of individual rights and freedom to choose legal approaches to realize own interests.

Legal ideal of Ayn Rand is pursuing individual happiness by rational self-interest and growing private property, excluding physical coercion (and neglecting non-physical), preferring economic power to political power, motivating others to cooperate by money instead of gun, reward instead of punishment, and pleasure instead of fear [1]. She recognizes the only coercive monopoly of government on the use of physical force and claim fairness of economic distribution by free trade on unregulated market. In Rand’s view, government enacts objective laws by authority of consent of the governed, as an agent of their self-defense, aimed to protect human from physical violence. Objective laws are clear and reasonable knowledge, what exactly is forbidden and why, what penalty will incur crime [2].

Legal ideal of Karl Marx is community of labour, work for common good and equality of wages paid out by communal capital, pursuing unity of man with nature, consistent naturalism of man and the consistent humanism of nature in the form of society, where man produces man, himself and the other man, without self-estrangement of individual as the social being. By the free labour society produces man and man produce society; Marx claims that private capital is pernicious, unfree objectification of labour, loss the natural senses of reality for satisfying greed, delusional sense of having, alienation of life in form of private property [3]. In his view, law is production of confrontation between greedy capitalists and exploited workers: capitalist government suppresses community to defend private property; socialist government suppresses capital to defend life of community [4].

Taking to consideration that personal autonomy have moral dimension of ideals and legal dimension of will, the best way to describe difference between Rand’s and Marx’s legal approach lay in the sphere of self-enforcement, sort of Kantian categorical imperative, applicable to self and to every person – ideal purification of will by rejection of some thoughts supposed to be irrational. Marx restrains thinking of needs to have, his radical socialism (communism) attributes to each man identity of worker with predictable needs to be covered by unification of production and distribution. Rand restrains thinking of obligations to give, her radical capitalism (objectivism) attributes to each man identity of capitalist with predictable capacity to own and enjoy private property protected by unified security forces. Controversial totality of promoted identities reveals blind desire to avoid conflicts by simple unification, possible root of poverty. Good legal system must be compatible with all forms of freedom, including capitalism and socialism, providing subsidiarity of justice which mean that everyone is free to live by own rules if capable, but common rules help to avoid incapability and abuses.

References

1. Rand, A., Branden, N., Greenspan, A., & Hessen, R. (1967). Capitalism: The unknown ideal. New York: Signet.

2. Rand, A., & Branden, N. (1964). The virtue of selfishness: A new concept of egoism. New York: New American Library.

3. Marx, K. Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. 

4. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). Manifesto of the Communist Party.

Creative Commons Attribution Öÿ ðîáîòà ë³öåíçóºòüñÿ â³äïîâ³äíî äî Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

äîïîìîãàÇíàéøëè ïîìèëêó? Âèä³ë³òü ïîìèëêîâèé òåêñò ³ íàòèñí³òü Ctrl + Enter




 ²íø³ íàóêîâ³ ïðàö³ äàíî¿ ñåêö³¿
ÏÎÐÓØÅÍÍß ÏÐÀ ² ÑÂÎÁÎÄ ÇÀÕ²ÄÍÎÓÊÐÀ¯ÍÑÜÊÎÃÎ ÍÀÑÅËÅÍÍß Ç ÏÅÐØÈÕ ÐÎʲ ÏÎËÜÑÜÊί ÎÊÓÏÀÖ²¯ Ó Ì²ÆÂΪÍÍÈÉ ÏÅвÎÄ
14.06.2017 19:36
ÏÐÀÂÎÂÅ ÐÅÃÓËÞÂÀÍÍß ÑÓÑϲËÜÍÈÕ Â²ÄÍÎÑÈÍ Â ÓÌÎÂÀÕ ÑÓ×ÀÑÍÈÕ ÐÅÔÎÐÌÀÖ²ÉÍÈÕ ÏÐÎÖÅѲ ÇÀÊÎÍÎÄÀÂÑÒÂÀ
14.06.2017 19:25
ÐÅÔÎÐÌÀ ÂÅÐÕÎÂÍί ÐÀÄÈ ÓÊÐÀ¯ÍÈ Ó Ñ²Ò˲ ÑÓ×ÀÑÍÈÕ ÐÅÔÎÐÌÀÖ²ÉÍÈÕ ÏÐÎÖÅѲ  ÓÊÐÀ¯Í²
14.06.2017 19:06
ÍÀÖÈÑÒÑÜÊÀ ÏÐÎÏÀÃÀÍÄÀ ßÊ ÔÀÊÒÎÐ ÊÐÈÇÈ ÏÐÀÂÎѲÄÎÌÎÑÒ² ÓÊÐÀ¯ÍÑÜÊÎÃÎ ÍÀÑÅËÅÍÍß Â ÓÌÎÂÀÕ ÎÊÓÏÀÖ²¯ (1941-1944 ÐÐ.)
07.06.2017 18:15
ÂÏËÈ ÍÀÖÈÑÒÑÜÊί ÏÐÎÏÀÃÀÍÄÈ ÍÀ ÏÐÀÂÎѲÄÎ̲ÑÒÜ ÓÊÐÀ¯Íֲ  ÓÌÎÂÀÕ ÎÊÓÏÀÖ²¯
07.06.2017 17:59
ÎÑÎÁËÈÂÎÑÒ² ÊÐÈ̲ÍÀËÜÍί ²ÄÏβÄÀËÜÍÎÑÒ² ÇÀ ÇËÎ×ÈÍÈ ÏÐÎÒÈ ÂËÀÑÍÎÑÒ²  ÊÊ ÓÑÐÐ 1927 Ð.
03.06.2017 13:32
ÇÀÃÀËÜÍÎÏÐÀÂβ ÏÐÈÍÖÈÏÈ ÞÐÈÄÈ×Íί ²ÄÏβÄÀËÜÍÎÑÒ² ÇÀ ÇËÎ×ÈÍÈ ÏÐÎÒÈ ÏÐÈÐÎÄÈ Â ÓÐÑÐ
02.06.2017 12:47




© 2006-2024 All Rights Reserved At use of data from the site, the reference to the www.lex-line.com.ua is obligatory!


Íàóêîâà ñï³ëüíîòà - ³íòåðíåò êîíôåðåíö³¿
̳æíàðîäíà ³íòåðíåò-êîíôåðåíö³ÿ ç åêîíîì³êè, ³íôîðìàö³éíèõ ñèñòåì ³ òåõíîëîã³é, ïñèõîëî㳿 òà ïåäàãîã³êè
Íàóêîâ³ êîíôåðåíö³¿
Àêòóàëüí³ äîñë³äæåííÿ ïðàâîâî¿ òà ³ñòîðè÷íî¿ íàóêè. Þðèäè÷íà ë³í³ÿ
 Ãîëîñóâàííÿ 
Ç ÿêèõ äæåðåë Âè ä³çíàëèñü ïðî íàøó êîíôåðåíö³þ:

ñîö³àëüí³ ìåðåæ³;
³íôîðìóâàííÿ åëåêòðîííîþ ïîøòîþ;
ïîøóêîâ³ ³íòåðíåò-ñèñòåìè (Google, Yahoo, Meta, Yandex);
³íòåðíåò-êàòàëîãè êîíôåðåíö³é (science-community.org, konferencii.ru, vsenauki.ru, ³íø³);
íàóêîâ³ ï³äðîçä³ëè ÂÓdzâ;
ïîðåêîìåíäóâàëè çíàéîì³.
ç ÑÌÑ ïîâ³äîìëåííÿ íà ìîá³ëüíèé òåëåôîí.


Ðåçóëüòàòè ãîëîñóâàíü Äîêëàäí³øå